A quote from "The 4 hour workweek", by Tim Ferris:
"There should never be more than two mission-critical items to complete each day. Never. It just isn't necessary if they're actually high-impact."
Before reading about this, my schedule was always filled with all kinds of things that I wanted to do. I was trying to read for 1 hour each day, blog for one 1 hour each day, work at project X for Y hours, and so on. It quickly became clear that this worked well only in the few days which don't bring unexpected variables (most days do). Also, it is hard to stop doing something after a fixed time, especially if you enjoy it or if it's not finished.
I was making it hard for myself, with so many items in my to-do list.
By the way: one of the reasons why I had so many items in my to-do list was because I wanted it all, and I wanted it now. I was very impatient, and not having time for each one of them each day made me even more impatient. That's something to avoid.
Last week I started testing this new method, and I like the results.
My to-do list now has very few items. Preparing it and going through it during the day was a boring and unpleasant experience, now it is fast and efficient. I also have enough time to do the things I am putting in the list, which is great.
It became clear that even if I don't do everything today, I am not losing anything. Instead of 1 hour / day all week, I will have 1 day dedicated to it. I can wait.
Some of the reasons why this method is probably better are:
- it is in concordance with the concept of batching, which is a very useful tool
- it eliminates most of the interior interruptions created by switching from one type of task to another (from the same book: "There is a psychological switching of gears that can require up to 45 minutes to resume a major task that has been interrupted.")
- you are not under the stress of so many things to do and so little time anymore
To finish, here is another inspiring quote: "Lack of time is actually lack of priorities." How true that is!